This week's class was cancelled and we were asked to discuss various models of Assistive Technology Assessment. Here are a few that I was able to find:
Models for Assistive Technology
1)
Model Name: The Human Activity Assistive Technology
(HATT) Model
Authors: A. M. Cook & S. M. Hussey
General
model for an AT system. Shows the interrelationship between system components.
Human Performance Model Bailey (1989) was developed by human
factors engineers and psychologists ... to assist in the design and application
of technology. Framework for studying human performance in tasks involving
technology.
Typically used to describe the performance of a
human in a given task (activity) in a given situation (context – environment).
2)
Model Name: The SETT Framework Author: Joy Zabala
The
SETT Framework was designed to aid the process of gathering, organizing, and
analyzing data to inform collaborative problem solving and decision-making
regarding assistive technology and appropriate educational programming for
students with disabilities. Information is gathered concerning the Student’s
abilities and needs, the Environment(s) in which the student navigates, the
Tasks required for the student’s active participa- tion in the activities
within the environment, and finally, the Tools needed for completing the tasks.
As transdisciplinary teams engage in the consider- ation process, key questions
associated with the SETT Framework (see Figure 1) provide a system- atic method
for discussion and decision-making. The intuitive nature of the SETT model has
led to its widespread use by school-based teams.
http://www.joyzabala.com/
3)
Model Name: Education Tech Points Authors: Gayl
Bowser and Penny Reed
Education Tech Points was created to facilitate
decision-making regarding the utilization of assistive technology services and
resources when planning educational programs for students with disabilities.
Bowser and Reed argue that each Education Tech Point represents a critical
juncture in the process of referral, evaluation, and develop- ment of the
Individualized Education Plan (IEP) or Individual Family Service Plan (IFSP).
As illus- trated in Figure2, the six key points are (1) referral, (2)
evaluation, (3) extended assessment, (4) plan development, (5) implementation,
and (6) periodic review. Because of the compatibility of this model with the
traditional special education referral and evaluation process, it has been
widely adopted in special education.
4)
Model Name: The AT CoPlanner Model
Authors: Leonard P. Haines, Gladene Robertson,
Robert Sanche, and col- leagues
Recognizing the value of technology to foster
communication and the time-lock pressures of the school day that infringe on
adequate time for collaborative planning, Haines, Robertson, Sanche, and
colleagues created,CoPlanner, a groupware product that supports communication,
collabora- tion, and co-planning. Additional content modules (i.e., Instruction
CoPlanner, Transition CoPlanner, and Assistive Technology CoPlanner) provide
elec- tronic worksheets and planning systems that support specific applications
of collaborative planning. In work describing the theoretical development of
the assistive technology module, Haines and Sanche (2000) summarize their
review of four common special education technology models and how they used a
normalization
5) The ABC Model Author: Rena Lewis
While technology can be helpful to everyone,
Lewis observed that it is important to recognize the unique contributions
technology offers students with disabilities. She suggested that these benefits
could be understood by noting that technology can Augment abilities and Bypass
or Compensate for disabilities (see Figure 5). This model is intuitively easy
to understand and is the essence of rehabilita- tion and therapy
decision-making.
6)Model Name: The A3 Model
Authors: Smith, Schwanke,
& Edyburn
The
A3 Model is a theoretical work that seeks to describe a developmental process
associated with efforts to provide access for individuals with disabilities to
facilities, programs, and information. As shown in Figure 12, the model
illustrates a web- and-flow of efforts that are needed to obtain universal
accessibility . In the first phase, Advocacy efforts raise awareness of
inequity and highlight the need for system change to respond to the needs of
individuals with disabilities. Accommodations are the typical response to
advocacy. Inaccessible environments and materials are therefore modified and
made available in phase 2. Typically, accom- modations are provided upon
request. While this represents a significant improvement over situa- tions
found in the earlier phase, accommodations tend to maintain inequality
since
there may be a delay
(i.e., time needed to
convert a handout from
print to
Braille), it may
require special effort to
obtain (i.e., call ahead to
schedule),
or it may require
going to a special location
(i.e., the only computer
with
screen reading
software is in the library)
The other part of our assignment was to find 10 Low Tech Assistive Tech items. Here are a few from the web and a few from my Learning Centre.
Clothes pins can be used for a variety of AT, including counters for basic math.
Simple shoe box and beads to create a shoe box activity for a blind student at my school. He counts the beads and puts them in the can.
Another shoe box activity. Different shapes with the blocks. Counting them and placing them into the container.
Muffin tray we use in the Learning Centre for a counting tray. We have velcro on the each for a tactile and the student feels each muffin top to count.
Simple wooden blocks with velcro. The student pulls them apart to develop fine motor strength.
Basic winter gloves with a ball, ball has velcro to aid student to catch the ball in PE class.
Basic pencil grip aid to support students with fine motor difficulty and to promote proper pencil grip.
Basic PVC piping used to have student hear themselves read, what they sound like.
Party ring on a mouse enables the student to hold onto the mouse pad.
In conclusion I really enjoyed the assignment. Thanks for reading :)
Fabulous low tech ideas/activities Scott thanks for sharing these. !
ReplyDelete